<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Ogonowoski&#8217;s Uniform Violation?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jmacforjeff.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/jim-ogonowoskis-uniform-violation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jmacforjeff.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/jim-ogonowoskis-uniform-violation/</link>
	<description>The Inside Scoop on the Massachusetts Senatorial Election</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 17:44:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jmacforjeff</title>
		<link>http://jmacforjeff.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/jim-ogonowoskis-uniform-violation/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>jmacforjeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmacforjeff.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t call me dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t call me dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wavemaker</title>
		<link>http://jmacforjeff.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/jim-ogonowoskis-uniform-violation/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>wavemaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 13:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmacforjeff.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Well chief, it could be because he&#039;s not &quot;wearing the uniform&quot; while campaigning, he&#039;s displaying a picture of him while legally in uniform, which is entirely permissible -- as it is for Beatty in his own campaign photos.

Pretty sloppy work, dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well chief, it could be because he&#8217;s not &#8220;wearing the uniform&#8221; while campaigning, he&#8217;s displaying a picture of him while legally in uniform, which is entirely permissible &#8212; as it is for Beatty in his own campaign photos.</p>
<p>Pretty sloppy work, dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
